Farm Subsidy information
Arizona
Total Subsidies in Arizona, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 2,603
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Arizona totaled $113,165,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Desert Valley Honey LLC | Phoenix, AZ 85041 | $56,063 |
122 | Sierra Farming Partnership III | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $55,995 |
123 | Manuel C Canez Jr | Tucson, AZ 85713 | $53,933 |
124 | Fourr Ranch Land And Cattle, LLC | Dragoon, AZ 85609 | $52,558 |
125 | Turkey Creek Livestock Association | Whiteriver, AZ 85941 | $52,530 |
126 | , | $52,246 | |
127 | Fort Mojave Indian Tribe Fmit Avi Kwa Ame Farms | Mohave Valley, AZ 86446 | $52,138 |
128 | Auza Ranches LLC | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $51,669 |
129 | Mann Ranch LLC | Mammoth, AZ 85618 | $50,901 |
130 | Santa Cruz Ranch | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $50,195 |
131 | Lyman Ranches Limited | Payson, AZ 85541 | $49,787 |
132 | Terra Firma | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $49,423 |
133 | Jd Cattle LLC | Skull Valley, AZ 86338 | $49,306 |
134 | , | $48,337 | |
135 | Thomas R Hamill | Kirkland, AZ 86332 | $48,255 |
136 | Navarro Ranch LLC | Green Valley, AZ 85622 | $47,862 |
137 | Swan Farms | Cibola, AZ 85328 | $47,500 |
138 | Mohawk Valley Farms Gp | Roll, AZ 85347 | $47,500 |
139 | , | $47,500 | |
140 | Zr Cattle Company LLC | Benson, AZ 85602 | $46,667 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”