Total Commodity Programs in Arizona, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 12,783
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Arizona totaled $1,704,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Morning Star Farms | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $2,687,992 |
122 | Don Pew Farms | Queen Creek, AZ 85142 | $2,679,730 |
123 | Alcaida Farms | Parker, AZ 85344 | $2,676,034 |
124 | Salzman Farms | Elfrida, AZ 85610 | $2,645,394 |
125 | Ruby Farms | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $2,636,027 |
126 | Sundance Ranch | Parker, AZ 85344 | $2,625,992 |
127 | Swan Farms | Cibola, AZ 85328 | $2,625,627 |
128 | Sierra Farming Partnership III | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $2,602,576 |
129 | Keyah Farms | Parker, AZ 85344 | $2,599,161 |
130 | Jack Rayner And Sons | Midnight, MS 39115 | $2,589,617 |
131 | Bernal Bros | Tucson, AZ 85712 | $2,586,045 |
132 | Agua Fria Farms II | Waddell, AZ 85355 | $2,585,699 |
133 | Ak Chin Farms | Maricopa, AZ 85239 | $2,585,399 |
134 | Selma Farms Ptshp | Casa Grande, AZ 85230 | $2,573,036 |
135 | Tierra Verde Farms Ptshp | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $2,542,948 |
136 | Timbuck Two Ptn | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $2,486,153 |
137 | Wood Bros Farms | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $2,479,828 |
138 | Paloma Dairy Lp | Gila Bend, AZ 85337 | $2,475,494 |
139 | Vaquero Company | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $2,462,758 |
140 | Prechel Farms | Coolidge, AZ 85228 | $2,453,858 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”