Production Flexibility Program in Arizona, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 2,099
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Arizona totaled $272,223,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Householder Farms | Stanfield, AZ 85272 | $386,501 |
162 | Pacheco Farm Management & Consulting Co | Marana, AZ 85653 | $385,589 |
163 | Sunfresh Farms | Goodyear, AZ 85338 | $384,156 |
164 | Odom Ranches | Litchfield, AZ 85340 | $382,279 |
165 | Sierra West Farms | Laveen, AZ 85339 | $382,080 |
166 | V & K Wakimoto Farms | Mohave Valley, AZ 86446 | $381,772 |
167 | Delbert & Jewell Lewis Farms | Florence, AZ 85232 | $381,154 |
168 | Casino Farms | Queen Creek, AZ 85140 | $379,702 |
169 | Lyreedale Farms General Partnersh | Roll, AZ 85347 | $379,677 |
170 | Alex & Norman Pretzer | Tucson, AZ 85715 | $379,376 |
171 | Clark Mickey & Louise | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $378,710 |
172 | B & M Farms Ptshp | Stanfield, AZ 85272 | $377,540 |
173 | James W & Judith K Cuming | Somerton, AZ 85350 | $377,294 |
174 | Rogers Farms | Pearce, AZ 85625 | $374,920 |
175 | Double B Farms A Ptns | Marana, AZ 85653 | $374,642 |
176 | Haggard Land & Cattle 96 | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $372,900 |
177 | Dell Vance Farms & Invts Jt Ven | Tempe, AZ 85284 | $372,144 |
178 | Emrald Cotton Farms Ptn | Glendale, AZ 85303 | $371,913 |
179 | S & N Equipment Co/triple P Farms | Marana, AZ 85653 | $370,029 |
180 | Power Enterprises 95 | Higley, AZ 85236 | $369,205 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”