Production Flexibility Program in Arizona, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 2,099

Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Arizona totaled $272,223,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Production Flexibility Program
1995-2023
161Householder FarmsStanfield, AZ 85272$386,501
162Pacheco Farm Management & Consulting CoMarana, AZ 85653$385,589
163Sunfresh FarmsGoodyear, AZ 85338$384,156
164Odom RanchesLitchfield, AZ 85340$382,279
165Sierra West FarmsLaveen, AZ 85339$382,080
166V & K Wakimoto FarmsMohave Valley, AZ 86446$381,772
167Delbert & Jewell Lewis FarmsFlorence, AZ 85232$381,154
168Casino FarmsQueen Creek, AZ 85140$379,702
169Lyreedale Farms General PartnershRoll, AZ 85347$379,677
170Alex & Norman PretzerTucson, AZ 85715$379,376
171Clark Mickey & LouiseCoolidge, AZ 85128$378,710
172B & M Farms PtshpStanfield, AZ 85272$377,540
173James W & Judith K CumingSomerton, AZ 85350$377,294
174Rogers FarmsPearce, AZ 85625$374,920
175Double B Farms A PtnsMarana, AZ 85653$374,642
176Haggard Land & Cattle 96Buckeye, AZ 85326$372,900
177Dell Vance Farms & Invts Jt VenTempe, AZ 85284$372,144
178Emrald Cotton Farms PtnGlendale, AZ 85303$371,913
179S & N Equipment Co/triple P FarmsMarana, AZ 85653$370,029
180Power Enterprises 95Higley, AZ 85236$369,205

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag