Cotton Ginning Program in Arizona, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 280
Recipients of Cotton Ginning Program from farms in Arizona totaled $13,937,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Ginning Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Mark Poe Rpt Farms | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $91,140 |
42 | Harrison Farms Family Partnership | Yuma, AZ 85365 | $90,670 |
43 | Cockrill Bros Ptshp | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $89,104 |
44 | Raintree Farms II | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $84,093 |
45 | S & S Harvesting | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $83,384 |
46 | Bartlett & Bartlett Farms | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $83,200 |
47 | Clark Farms Jv | Tucson, AZ 85743 | $82,912 |
48 | Sierra Farming Partnership II | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $80,202 |
49 | River Bush Farms | Eloy, AZ 85131 | $80,004 |
50 | Harvey Farms Lmtd Ptnshp | Yuma, AZ 85366 | $80,000 |
51 | Belloc's Inc | Eloy, AZ 85131 | $80,000 |
52 | Fifth Generation Farms | Avondale, AZ 85392 | $79,580 |
53 | David Wuertz General Ptshp | Chandler, AZ 85249 | $78,776 |
54 | Gingg Farms | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $78,054 |
55 | Rolanco Farms | Parker, AZ 85344 | $77,040 |
56 | Gila Valley Farms L P | Yuma, AZ 85365 | $76,448 |
57 | Martori Family General Partnershi | Scottsdale, AZ 85260 | $76,279 |
58 | Cotton Patch | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $75,716 |
59 | 3sk Farms Partnership | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $75,086 |
60 | Adam Layton Farms LLC | Thatcher, AZ 85552 | $74,608 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”