Karnal Bunt Fungus Eradication Program in Arizona, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 177
Recipients of Karnal Bunt Fungus Eradication Program from farms in Arizona totaled $17,470,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Karnal Bunt Fungus Eradication Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Rogers Brothers Farms Ptnshp | Laveen, AZ 85339 | $51,431 |
22 | Salt River Valley Farms | Mesa, AZ 85211 | $51,224 |
23 | James W & Judith K Cuming | Somerton, AZ 85350 | $48,326 |
24 | Colorado River Farms Inc | Ehrenberg, AZ 85334 | $47,836 |
25 | S D Farms | Phoenix, AZ 85021 | $47,815 |
26 | Gingg Farms | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $46,203 |
27 | Associated Farming 92 | Mesa, AZ 85213 | $43,581 |
28 | Desert Sun Marketing Co. Inc. | Phoenix, AZ 85076 | $42,984 |
29 | Ramona I Button | Sacaton, AZ 85147 | $42,654 |
30 | Lueck Farming Co., Inc. | Litchfield Park, AZ 85340 | $40,266 |
31 | Montie R And Diana K Lee And | Yuma, AZ 85366 | $36,275 |
32 | Carranza Farms | Stanfield, AZ 85272 | $35,617 |
33 | G Farms | El Mirage, AZ 85335 | $35,387 |
34 | P R P Farms | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $35,141 |
35 | D Lamoreaux Farms II | Eloy, AZ 85131 | $34,493 |
36 | Cargill Turkey Products | Harrisonburg, VA 22801 | $34,443 |
37 | Brooks Farms | Goodyear, AZ 85338 | $33,697 |
38 | Timothy & Eileen Dunn Trust | Yuma, AZ 85364 | $33,500 |
39 | Arizona Plant Breeders, Inc. | Arizona City, AZ 85223 | $32,967 |
40 | Prechel Farms | Coolidge, AZ 85228 | $31,651 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”