Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Arizona, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 33
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Arizona totaled $2,590,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Butterfield Dairy LLC | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $422,000 |
2 | Zinke Dairy Inc | Sun Lakes, AZ 85248 | $291,688 |
3 | Caballero Dairy Farms LLC | Chandler, AZ 85249 | $242,500 |
4 | Paloma Dairy Lp | Gila Bend, AZ 85337 | $234,500 |
5 | Aglynx Supply LLC | Yuma, AZ 85365 | $187,304 |
6 | Amigo Farms Inc | Yuma, AZ 85365 | $170,061 |
7 | Triple G Dairy Lllp | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $168,179 |
8 | Tlc Custom Farming Company, LLC | Yuma, AZ 85364 | $154,125 |
9 | Grand View Dairy LLC | Phoenix, AZ 85016 | $108,411 |
10 | Legend Produce LLC | Scottsdale, AZ 85258 | $88,333 |
11 | Desert Cross Holdings LLC | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $61,058 |
12 | Sunset Farms General Partnership | Gila Bend, AZ 85337 | $59,605 |
13 | Sasco Cattle Co LLC | Red Rock, AZ 85145 | $59,165 |
14 | Clint Curry Farms LLC | Yuma, AZ 85364 | $49,362 |
15 | Belleacres Farms | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $47,706 |
16 | Black Canyon Cattle Co. LLC | Springerville, AZ 85938 | $36,905 |
17 | Koepnick Family Farms | San Tan Valley, AZ 85143 | $35,340 |
18 | Sawyer Cattle Company LLC | Maricopa, AZ 85138 | $26,850 |
19 | Triple M Farms 95 | Gilbert, AZ 85234 | $22,988 |
20 | Valerie Kelly | Winslow, AZ 86047 | $22,303 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>