Dairy Programs in Arizona, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 223
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Arizona totaled $33,759,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Du-brook Dairy Inc | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $659,172 |
2 | Windmill Dairy LLC Dba El Dorado Dairy | Casa Grande, AZ 85128 | $573,989 |
3 | Zinke Dairy Inc | Sun Lakes, AZ 85248 | $567,778 |
4 | Stotz Farms Inc Dba Stotz Dairy | Avondale, AZ 85392 | $551,947 |
5 | Arizona Dairy Co | Gilbert, AZ 85234 | $532,895 |
6 | Rainbow Valley Dairy | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $511,767 |
7 | Dan W Boschma Dba Tonopah Dairy | Tonopah, AZ 85354 | $500,738 |
8 | Piazzo Dairy LLC | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $476,207 |
9 | Grand View Dairy LLC | Phoenix, AZ 85016 | $455,449 |
10 | D & I Holsteins LLC | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $450,365 |
11 | David Feenstra Dba Feenstra Friesians | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $442,005 |
12 | T & K Red River Dairy Ltd Ptshp | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $436,681 |
13 | Anthony Russell Dugan | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $435,936 |
14 | Double D Dairy Ltd | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $429,234 |
15 | Milky Way Dairy LLC | Maricopa, AZ 85139 | $424,133 |
16 | Creamline Dairy Inc | Chandler, AZ 85286 | $416,843 |
17 | Thomas Michael Dugan Jr | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $416,104 |
18 | Timothy Scott Dugan | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $406,705 |
19 | Gerben Boschma Dairy | Tolleson, AZ 85353 | $401,945 |
20 | Paloma Dairy Lp | Gila Bend, AZ 85337 | $386,626 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>