Farm Subsidy information
Arizona
Total Subsidies in Arizona, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 2,245
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Arizona totaled $129,028,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | T & K Red River Dairy Ltd Ptshp | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $275,404 |
62 | Ross Farms | Sedona, AZ 86336 | $275,014 |
63 | Bartlett & Bartlett Farms | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $272,869 |
64 | Schulz Farms, LLC | Tonopah, AZ 85354 | $270,116 |
65 | Y L Farms | Thatcher, AZ 85552 | $269,249 |
66 | Hiscox Farms Gp | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $268,466 |
67 | Jbh Farming | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $268,339 |
68 | Bret J Whitmer Farms | Thatcher, AZ 85552 | $264,929 |
69 | Randy & Nancy Haas Joint Venture | Willcox, AZ 85643 | $264,124 |
70 | Windmill Dairy LLC Dba El Dorado Dairy | Casa Grande, AZ 85128 | $264,013 |
71 | Dust Boll Farms | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $260,419 |
72 | Santa Cruz Ranch | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $259,254 |
73 | Stotz Farms Inc Dba Stotz Dairy | Avondale, AZ 85392 | $257,067 |
74 | Koepnick Family Farms | San Tan Valley, AZ 85143 | $255,431 |
75 | Red Bullet Farms | Scottsdale, AZ 85260 | $253,615 |
76 | Raintree Farms II | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $252,806 |
77 | E & S Farming, LLC | San Jacinto, CA 92582 | $250,000 |
78 | Antonio M Haro Bianem Farms | Casa Grande, AZ 85122 | $248,183 |
79 | Mark Poe Rpt Farms | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $247,471 |
80 | Dakota Farms LLC | Maricopa, AZ 85139 | $247,184 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”