Counter Cyclical Program in Arizona, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,990
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Arizona totaled $370,165,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Lkh Farming An Arizona Gp | Ehrenberg, AZ 85334 | $2,094,844 |
| 22 | Rogers Brothers Farms Ptnshp | Laveen, AZ 85339 | $1,977,400 |
| 23 | Carranza Farms | Stanfield, AZ 85272 | $1,938,340 |
| 24 | Cheyenne Farming Company | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $1,934,824 |
| 25 | G Farms | El Mirage, AZ 85335 | $1,924,330 |
| 26 | S D Farms | Phoenix, AZ 85021 | $1,887,287 |
| 27 | Vip Farms | Thatcher, AZ 85552 | $1,827,650 |
| 28 | Legacy Farming Company | Tolleson, AZ 85353 | $1,824,688 |
| 29 | Fort Mojave Tribe | Mohave Valley, AZ 86446 | $1,761,809 |
| 30 | Ross Farms | Sedona, AZ 86336 | $1,735,805 |
| 31 | New Magma Farms Ptshp | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $1,731,304 |
| 32 | Waddell General Ptn 93 | Tolleson, AZ 85353 | $1,716,465 |
| 33 | Marathon Farming Co Ptshp | Casa Grande, AZ 85230 | $1,699,105 |
| 34 | Keeling Family Ptshp | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $1,674,216 |
| 35 | Texas Hill Farms | Roll, AZ 85347 | $1,654,700 |
| 36 | Sunset Farms | Gila Bend, AZ 85337 | $1,618,872 |
| 37 | Carver Mountain Enterprises | Laveen, AZ 85339 | $1,564,416 |
| 38 | Lone Butte Partnership | Laveen, AZ 85339 | $1,554,188 |
| 39 | Eagle Tail Farming Partnership | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $1,551,488 |
| 40 | Santa Maria Farms II 93 | Laveen, AZ 85339 | $1,540,800 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf