Market Loss Assistance Program in Arizona, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 3,408
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Arizona totaled $142,648,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | John Thude Farms Ptshp 2 | Stanfield, AZ 85272 | $688,860 |
| 22 | Falfa Farms 95 | Eloy, AZ 85131 | $684,317 |
| 23 | Rogers Brothers Farms Ptnshp | Laveen, AZ 85339 | $666,240 |
| 24 | Associated Farming 92 | Mesa, AZ 85213 | $643,145 |
| 25 | 4 B Farms | Phoenix, AZ 85008 | $634,018 |
| 26 | Marathon Farming Co Ptshp | Casa Grande, AZ 85230 | $623,115 |
| 27 | Santa Maria Farms II 93 | Laveen, AZ 85339 | $618,660 |
| 28 | Adams Farms Ptnshp | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $582,960 |
| 29 | Burruel & Burruel Farms Ptshp | Marana, AZ 85653 | $566,555 |
| 30 | Texas Hill Farms | Roll, AZ 85347 | $559,552 |
| 31 | Carranza Farms | Stanfield, AZ 85272 | $557,656 |
| 32 | Bales & Bales II | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $555,105 |
| 33 | Santa Lucia Farms G P 97 | Phoenix, AZ 85037 | $547,300 |
| 34 | S D Farms | Phoenix, AZ 85021 | $543,632 |
| 35 | Jarnagin Farms Ptn 96 | Phoenix, AZ 85037 | $539,213 |
| 36 | Lone Butte Partnership | Laveen, AZ 85339 | $536,988 |
| 37 | Cullison Farms | Wellton, AZ 85356 | $531,882 |
| 38 | Eagle Farms | Gilbert, AZ 85234 | $531,672 |
| 39 | Auza & Son Farms Ptshp | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $524,280 |
| 40 | Pettco Associates | Mesa, AZ 85203 | $524,140 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf