Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Arizona, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 976
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Arizona totaled $22,932,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41 | S&j Ranching & Grazing LLC | Camp Verde, AZ 86322 | $75,304 |
| 42 | Jeanette Pierce Rev Living Trust | San Simon, AZ 85632 | $74,537 |
| 43 | Western Cerro LLC | San Simon, AZ 85632 | $74,015 |
| 44 | Donna Mitchell | Elfrida, AZ 85610 | $73,050 |
| 45 | Mcnelly Ranches LLC | Williams, AZ 86046 | $70,000 |
| 46 | Blair Farms Inc | Lordsburg, NM 88045 | $68,189 |
| 47 | Glenn Williams | Elfrida, AZ 85610 | $67,500 |
| 48 | Miedema Produce Inc | Waddell, AZ 85355 | $67,315 |
| 49 | J-v Farms, Inc | Yuma, AZ 85366 | $66,207 |
| 50 | Sycamore Farms LLC | Phoenix, AZ 85003 | $65,237 |
| 51 | Idt Cattle Association | San Carlos, AZ 85550 | $64,039 |
| 52 | F Bar Cattle Co | Snowflake, AZ 85937 | $61,971 |
| 53 | Yellow Snail Farms | Scottsdale, AZ 85260 | $61,875 |
| 54 | Milton Schmidt | Willcox, AZ 85643 | $61,693 |
| 55 | Mark Michaels | Willcox, AZ 85643 | $59,833 |
| 56 | John F King & Son Inc | Tucson, AZ 85736 | $59,499 |
| 57 | Joe Auza Sheep Co | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $59,487 |
| 58 | Mike Hayhurst | Huachuca City, AZ 85616 | $59,086 |
| 59 | Calvin Allred | Willcox, AZ 85643 | $58,394 |
| 60 | Donna Howe | Queen Creek, AZ 85242 | $57,764 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf