Total Commodity Programs in Arizona, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 89
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Arizona totaled $4,089,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Greengate Fresh Lllp | Salinas, CA 93902 | $487,487 |
2 | Butterfield Dairy LLC | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $423,415 |
3 | Zinke Dairy Inc | Sun Lakes, AZ 85248 | $312,592 |
4 | Amigo Farms Inc | Yuma, AZ 85365 | $295,109 |
5 | Caballero Dairy Farms LLC | Chandler, AZ 85249 | $252,952 |
6 | Paloma Dairy Lp | Gila Bend, AZ 85337 | $244,952 |
7 | Aglynx Supply LLC | Yuma, AZ 85365 | $187,304 |
8 | Triple G Dairy Lllp | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $178,630 |
9 | Tlc Custom Farming Company, LLC | Yuma, AZ 85364 | $154,125 |
10 | Grand View Dairy LLC | Phoenix, AZ 85016 | $145,122 |
11 | De Jong Dairy | Maricopa, AZ 85139 | $123,459 |
12 | Legend Produce LLC | Scottsdale, AZ 85258 | $88,333 |
13 | Black Canyon Cattle Co. LLC | Springerville, AZ 85938 | $81,455 |
14 | Koepnick Family Farms | San Tan Valley, AZ 85143 | $68,472 |
15 | Perry 7 Farms LLC | Higley, AZ 85236 | $64,329 |
16 | Desert Cross Holdings LLC | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $61,058 |
17 | Sunset Farms General Partnership | Gila Bend, AZ 85337 | $59,605 |
18 | Sasco Cattle Co LLC | Red Rock, AZ 85145 | $59,165 |
19 | Clint Curry Farms LLC | Yuma, AZ 85364 | $49,362 |
20 | Grandview Dairy II Llp | Phoenix, AZ 85016 | $47,945 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>