Farm Subsidy information
Arizona
Total Subsidies in Arizona, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 16,833
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Arizona totaled $2,607,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Donley Farms | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $5,474,620 |
42 | Bales & Bales II | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $5,387,878 |
43 | Barkley Seed, Inc. | Yuma, AZ 85366 | $5,276,141 |
44 | Santa Maria Farms II 93 | Laveen, AZ 85339 | $5,275,175 |
45 | Broken Wing Farms | Scottsdale, AZ 85260 | $5,200,933 |
46 | Marathon Farming Co Ptshp | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $5,096,244 |
47 | Carver Mountain Enterprises | Laveen, AZ 85339 | $4,962,835 |
48 | Arizona Grain Company | Casa Grande, AZ 85230 | $4,959,411 |
49 | Eagle Farms | Gilbert, AZ 85234 | $4,896,780 |
50 | Desert Conservation Farms | Queen Creek, AZ 85142 | $4,893,605 |
51 | Gin Ranch 94 | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $4,840,238 |
52 | Lone Butte Partnership | Laveen, AZ 85339 | $4,824,787 |
53 | Rg Howard Farms | Thatcher, AZ 85552 | $4,819,296 |
54 | Sunset Farms | Gila Bend, AZ 85337 | $4,788,542 |
55 | Carmichael Farms 96 | Palo Verde, AZ 85343 | $4,763,825 |
56 | F & M Farms Baldenegro | Parker, AZ 85344 | $4,745,384 |
57 | Buckelew Farms II Ptns | Parker, AZ 85344 | $4,549,853 |
58 | 4 B Farms | Phoenix, AZ 85008 | $4,534,484 |
59 | Rancho Pobre Farms | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $4,534,063 |
60 | Cullison Farms | Wellton, AZ 85356 | $4,533,461 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”