Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Apache County, Arizona, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 435
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Apache County, Arizona totaled $1,187,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Slash J Ranch LLC | Thatcher, AZ 85552 | $9,154 |
22 | Kevin B Mcfee | Eagar, AZ 85925 | $8,558 |
23 | Ross Overson Jr | Saint Johns, AZ 85936 | $8,276 |
24 | , | $7,476 | |
25 | , | $7,313 | |
26 | Lucinda L Attakai | Sanders, AZ 86512 | $7,060 |
27 | Benjamin H Dodge | Window Rock, AZ 86515 | $6,903 |
28 | Merlyn L Rogers | Nutrioso, AZ 85932 | $6,836 |
29 | Donald Foster | Chambers, AZ 86502 | $6,483 |
30 | George Geisler Jr | Quemado, NM 87829 | $5,963 |
31 | Sheldon Wade Udall | Eagar, AZ 85925 | $5,684 |
32 | Steven K Brinkerhoff | Saint Johns, AZ 85936 | $5,543 |
33 | Hall Ranches LLC | Springerville, AZ 85938 | $5,346 |
34 | Flake Ranch LLC | Snowflake, AZ 85937 | $4,733 |
35 | Nonabah G Mahnke | Chinle, AZ 86503 | $4,379 |
36 | John Thompson | Eagar, AZ 85925 | $4,365 |
37 | Patsy R Lee | Ganado, AZ 86505 | $3,977 |
38 | Kenneth Salazar | St Johns, AZ 85936 | $3,647 |
39 | Charles T Ashley | Houck, AZ 86506 | $3,366 |
40 | Wilfred E Tahy | Ganado, AZ 86505 | $3,195 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”