Farm Subsidy information
Apache County, Arizona
Total Subsidies in Apache County, Arizona, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 4,824
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Apache County, Arizona totaled $97,383,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Rancho Alegre Cattle Co Inc | Saint Johns, AZ 85936 | $35,812 |
82 | Albert John | Lukachukai, AZ 86507 | $35,488 |
83 | Dorothy M Begay | Ganado, AZ 86505 | $34,474 |
84 | Benjamin Peshlakai | Saint Michaels, AZ 86511 | $34,014 |
85 | Patsy Rose Lee | Ganado, AZ 86505 | $33,988 |
86 | Thomas H Bia | Chambers, AZ 86502 | $33,708 |
87 | Lucinda G Davis | Fort Defiance, AZ 86504 | $33,610 |
88 | Ross W Overson | Saint Johns, AZ 85936 | $33,569 |
89 | Leo Madrid | Saint Johns, AZ 85936 | $33,466 |
90 | Terrance Litson | Tsaile, AZ 86556 | $33,169 |
91 | Dobson-dobson Livestock LLC | Chandler, AZ 85248 | $33,127 |
92 | John Ryan Chavez Sr | Avondale, AZ 85392 | $32,626 |
93 | Phyllis T Nalwood | Sanders, AZ 86512 | $32,521 |
94 | Betty Joe Mike | Chinle, AZ 86503 | $32,499 |
95 | Elwood Pahi | Chambers, AZ 86502 | $32,163 |
96 | Juan L Curley Sr | Ganado, AZ 86505 | $32,042 |
97 | Brandee Davis | St Johns, AZ 85936 | $31,949 |
98 | Mary Lou Yazzie | Sanders, AZ 86512 | $31,048 |
99 | Livingston Nez | Sanders, AZ 86512 | $30,873 |
100 | Hooper Hereford Ranch | Springerville, AZ 85938 | $30,788 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”