Farm Subsidy information
Apache County, Arizona
Total Subsidies in Apache County, Arizona, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 4,824
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Apache County, Arizona totaled $97,383,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | J Albert Brown Ranches | Saint Johns, AZ 85936 | $1,380,323 |
2 | Timberline Cattle Co LLC | Vernon, AZ 85940 | $887,941 |
3 | Lance Knight | Springerville, AZ 85938 | $852,126 |
4 | Donald Lann | Saint Johns, AZ 85936 | $817,502 |
5 | J J Johnson LLC | Saint Johns, AZ 85936 | $706,036 |
6 | Carey D Dobson | Vernon, AZ 85940 | $610,748 |
7 | Platt Cattle Company LLC | Saint Johns, AZ 85936 | $550,791 |
8 | Andrus Ranch Holdings LLC | Concho, AZ 85924 | $548,158 |
9 | J J Livestock Inc | Saint Johns, AZ 85936 | $515,259 |
10 | Galyn Knight | Springerville, AZ 85938 | $512,562 |
11 | Ganado Farm Board | Ganado, AZ 86505 | $466,205 |
12 | Spo Land And Cattle LLC | Springerville, AZ 85938 | $395,148 |
13 | Marcelino Diez | Concho, AZ 85924 | $325,699 |
14 | Nicoll Cattle Company LLC | Eagar, AZ 85925 | $221,187 |
15 | George Geisler Jr | Quemado, NM 87829 | $172,982 |
16 | Forest Energy Corporation | Show Low, AZ 85901 | $168,987 |
17 | Vanden Peter Nielsen | Saint Johns, AZ 85936 | $168,736 |
18 | Hubbell Livestock Company | Quemado, NM 87829 | $160,940 |
19 | Jerry Winn | Sanders, AZ 86512 | $158,495 |
20 | Orlando A Garcia | Camarillo, CA 93012 | $148,634 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>