Farm Subsidy information
Coconino County, Arizona
Total Subsidies in Coconino County, Arizona, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 651
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Coconino County, Arizona totaled $11,690,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Cholla Livestock LLC | Phoenix, AZ 85028 | $617,625 |
2 | Dietrich Family Lp | Phoenix, AZ 85028 | $500,000 |
3 | Bar T Bar Ranch Inc | Winslow, AZ 86047 | $428,775 |
4 | Babbitt Ranches LLC | Flagstaff, AZ 86002 | $369,322 |
5 | Cataract Natural Reserve Lands LLC | Flagstaff, AZ 86002 | $292,946 |
6 | Flying M Ranch Lllp | Flagstaff, AZ 86002 | $221,822 |
7 | Hopi Three Canyon Ranch LLC | Winslow, AZ 86047 | $117,875 |
8 | Manterola Sheep Co Inc | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $117,625 |
9 | Mcnelly Ranches LLC | Williams, AZ 86046 | $111,625 |
10 | Jimmie L Shiew | Flagstaff, AZ 86003 | $93,101 |
11 | Nagiller & Sons Inc | Williams, AZ 86046 | $88,818 |
12 | Howard Mesa Land And Cattle Co Ll | Prescott, AZ 86305 | $82,587 |
13 | Shiew Cattle, LLC | Paulden, AZ 86334 | $81,621 |
14 | Curt A Wells | Chino Valley, AZ 86323 | $80,532 |
15 | Fletcher Land And Cattle LLC | Chino Valley, AZ 86323 | $64,370 |
16 | Sue Frederick | Scottsdale, AZ 85255 | $64,200 |
17 | 55 Ranch LLC | Buckeye, AZ 85396 | $49,476 |
18 | Jilmat Inc | Williams, AZ 86046 | $44,019 |
19 | Windmill Mountain Ranch LLC | Sedona, AZ 86336 | $39,610 |
20 | Logan Hefner | Chino Valley, AZ 86323 | $30,195 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>