Total Disaster Programs in Gila County, Arizona, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 130
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Gila County, Arizona totaled $11,419,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Dwight Cooper | Roosevelt, AZ 85545 | $27,531 |
62 | Sanborn Land & Cattle Company | Mesa, AZ 85204 | $23,956 |
63 | Terence O Wheeler | Globe, AZ 85502 | $23,297 |
64 | Id Horse Program | San Carlos, AZ 85550 | $23,036 |
65 | Sanborn Land & Cattle Company | Globe, AZ 85501 | $22,486 |
66 | Grasshopper Livestock Association | Cibecue, AZ 85911 | $21,959 |
67 | Jim R Brown | Payson, AZ 85541 | $21,092 |
68 | Canyon Day Livestock Association | Whiteriver, AZ 85941 | $20,875 |
69 | Kevin Kenneth Kirby | Barry, TX 75102 | $20,461 |
70 | Dc Cattle Company LLC | Globe, AZ 85501 | $20,004 |
71 | Del Shay Ranch Inc | Chandler, AZ 85244 | $17,584 |
72 | Cibecue Livestock Association | Whiteriver, AZ 85941 | $17,434 |
73 | Glenn Links | Winkelman, AZ 85292 | $17,374 |
74 | Joseph Youngblood | Globe, AZ 85502 | $17,102 |
75 | James M Weidenbener | Queen Creek, AZ 85142 | $13,991 |
76 | Melvin Warbington | Globe, AZ 85501 | $13,275 |
77 | William Irvine | Chandler, AZ 85248 | $12,649 |
78 | Griffin Cattle Ranch | Globe, AZ 85502 | $11,580 |
79 | James Marion Weidenbener | Queen Creek, AZ 85142 | $11,245 |
80 | Joshua D Smart | Pima, AZ 85543 | $10,674 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”