Farm Subsidy information
Gila County, Arizona
Total Subsidies in Gila County, Arizona, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 145
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Gila County, Arizona totaled $31,055,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Fort Apache Restoration LLC | Fort Apache, AZ 85926 | $176,415 |
22 | Arthur F Rivera | Claypool, AZ 85532 | $165,737 |
23 | Troy Neal | Payson, AZ 85541 | $152,274 |
24 | Lyman Ranches Limited | Payson, AZ 85541 | $142,953 |
25 | J Bar B Cattle Co | Phoenix, AZ 85042 | $142,264 |
26 | J Bar S Ranch LLC | Lamar, CO 81052 | $137,582 |
27 | Michael A Oddonetto | Globe, AZ 85501 | $131,862 |
28 | Rafter P Ranch LLC | Globe, AZ 85502 | $123,716 |
29 | Bain Grantham | Globe, AZ 85502 | $116,917 |
30 | Rockin Four Ranch LLC | Phoenix, AZ 85009 | $116,913 |
31 | Dorothy Cline Wells Trust | Tonto Basin, AZ 85553 | $115,280 |
32 | Muleshoe X Cattle Co | Payson, AZ 85541 | $112,416 |
33 | Radium Cattle Co LLC | Globe, AZ 85501 | $104,938 |
34 | George T Cline Equity Trust | Tonto Basin, AZ 85553 | $101,930 |
35 | Bill W Conway | Tonto Basin, AZ 85553 | $97,552 |
36 | O Bar C Ranch LLC | Tonto Basin, AZ 85553 | $88,840 |
37 | Walnut Creek Ventures LLC | Young, AZ 85554 | $85,425 |
38 | Chris Ball | Pawhuska, OK 74056 | $85,081 |
39 | Charley E Johnson Revocable Living Trust | Globe, AZ 85501 | $84,999 |
40 | Point Of Pines Livestock Associat | San Carlos, AZ 85550 | $79,124 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”