Farm Subsidy information

Gila County, Arizona

Total Subsidies in Gila County, Arizona, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 145

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Gila County, Arizona totaled $31,055,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2023
1White Mountain Apache TribeWhiteriver, AZ 85941$1,460,017
2Point Of Pines Livestock AssociationSan Carlos, AZ 85550$1,087,769
3Ash Creek Grazing AssociationSan Carlos, AZ 85550$903,050
4Slaughter Mountain Livestock AssociationSan Carlos, AZ 85550$768,812
5John L JohnsonYoung, AZ 85554$762,076
6Griffin Cattle Ranch LLCGlobe, AZ 85502$589,751
7Anchor Seven Livestock AssociatioSan Carlos, AZ 85550$556,075
8R-100 RanchSan Carlos, AZ 85550$473,823
9Tonto Livestock AssociationSan Carlos, AZ 85550$397,856
10Idt Cattle AssociationSan Carlos, AZ 85550$356,232
11Carrizo Livestock AssociationWhiteriver, AZ 85941$319,640
12North Fork Livestock AssociationWhiteriver, AZ 85941$302,291
13Lori L BrownPayson, AZ 85541$281,544
14Turkey Creek Livestock AssociationWhiteriver, AZ 85941$280,128
15Daniel J CooperYoung, AZ 85554$274,943
16Tw Land And Livestock LLCPhoenix, AZ 85014$238,617
17M-lazy-s Cattle Company IncYoung, AZ 85554$224,285
18M Bar K Cattle Co LLCGlobe, AZ 85501$200,245
19Erickson Family TrustParadise Valley, AZ 85253$189,279
20Id Horse ProgramSan Carlos, AZ 85550$188,524

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag