Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Gila County, Arizona, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 27
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Gila County, Arizona totaled $664,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Slaughter Mountain Livestock Association | San Carlos, AZ 85550 | $89,824 |
2 | M Bar K Cattle Co LLC | Globe, AZ 85501 | $86,398 |
3 | J Bar S Ranch LLC | Lamar, CO 81052 | $67,523 |
4 | J-s Farms Inc | Lamar, CO 81052 | $64,894 |
5 | John L Johnson | Young, AZ 85554 | $56,387 |
6 | Griffin Cattle Ranch LLC | Globe, AZ 85502 | $42,131 |
7 | M-lazy-s Cattle Company Inc | Young, AZ 85554 | $32,025 |
8 | Muleshoe X Cattle Co | Payson, AZ 85541 | $26,309 |
9 | Rafter P Ranch LLC | Globe, AZ 85502 | $18,900 |
10 | Radium Cattle Co LLC | Globe, AZ 85501 | $18,379 |
11 | Lori L Brown | Payson, AZ 85541 | $17,749 |
12 | Dorothy Cline Wells Trust | Tonto Basin, AZ 85553 | $14,987 |
13 | Bain Grantham | Globe, AZ 85502 | $14,664 |
14 | Walnut Creek Ventures LLC | Young, AZ 85554 | $14,625 |
15 | Michael Hemovich | Young, AZ 85554 | $14,239 |
16 | O Bar C Ranch LLC | Tonto Basin, AZ 85553 | $12,636 |
17 | Bill W Conway | Tonto Basin, AZ 85553 | $11,243 |
18 | Troy Neal | Payson, AZ 85541 | $11,224 |
19 | Tamara G Smith 2004 Irrevocable Trust | Payson, AZ 85541 | $10,943 |
20 | , | $10,523 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>