Total Commodity Programs in Graham County, Arizona, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 481
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Graham County, Arizona totaled $59,002,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Jim Daley | Thatcher, AZ 85552 | $192,714 |
62 | Lynn Daley | Thatcher, AZ 85552 | $192,487 |
63 | Heidi Todd | Willcox, AZ 85643 | $180,337 |
64 | Wl Mattice Farms | Thatcher, AZ 85552 | $174,616 |
65 | Brent R Haas & Kimberly Haas Revo | Willcox, AZ 85643 | $172,327 |
66 | Kimberly J Haas | Willcox, AZ 85643 | $172,327 |
67 | Jdh & Sons | Thatcher, AZ 85552 | $169,943 |
68 | Jerry Kempton | Safford, AZ 85546 | $167,680 |
69 | Bonita Ranch Inc | Willcox, AZ 85643 | $166,444 |
70 | Clonts Family Farm | Safford, AZ 85546 | $162,412 |
71 | Palmer Land & Cattle | Thatcher, AZ 85552 | $159,953 |
72 | Timm Haas | Mule Creek, NM 88051 | $157,510 |
73 | Bonita Valley Apple Co | Watseka, IL 60970 | $150,102 |
74 | Brandt R Lamb Dba B&s Farm | Pima, AZ 85543 | $148,928 |
75 | Ronald Evans | Fort Thomas, AZ 85536 | $147,304 |
76 | Jennifer L Haas | Mule Creek, NM 88051 | $142,315 |
77 | Dale Stringfellow | Pima, AZ 85543 | $133,569 |
78 | Anderson Brothers | San Clemente, CA 92672 | $132,990 |
79 | Jon Jarvis | Solomon, AZ 85551 | $119,799 |
80 | Growers Market Inc | Paradise Valley, AZ 85253 | $118,834 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”