Cotton Transistion Assistance Program in Maricopa County, Arizona, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 167
Recipients of Cotton Transistion Assistance Program from farms in Maricopa County, Arizona totaled $8,229,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Transistion Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Golden Sands Partnership | Flagstaff, AZ 86004 | $122,348 |
22 | G Farms | El Mirage, AZ 85335 | $119,287 |
23 | Waddell General Ptn 93 | Tolleson, AZ 85353 | $116,533 |
24 | Martori Family General Partnershi | Scottsdale, AZ 85260 | $112,623 |
25 | Schulz Farms | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $111,359 |
26 | Jason Perry Farms Partnership | Higley, AZ 85236 | $111,240 |
27 | Hardison Farms II | Arlington, AZ 85322 | $107,298 |
28 | S D Farms | Phoenix, AZ 85021 | $106,000 |
29 | Carmichael Farms 96 | Palo Verde, AZ 85343 | $104,934 |
30 | Bales & Bales II | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $103,574 |
31 | Tonopah Farms | Tonopah, AZ 85354 | $92,400 |
32 | Catron Cotton Co | Tonopah, AZ 85354 | $91,319 |
33 | Belleacres Farms | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $90,461 |
34 | Stotz Farming | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $81,264 |
35 | Cow Chow Croppers | Glendale, AZ 85303 | $75,109 |
36 | Santa Maria Farms II 93 | Laveen, AZ 85339 | $74,957 |
37 | Gladden Farms II | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $74,673 |
38 | Shelton Farms | Goodyear, AZ 85338 | $74,241 |
39 | K&s Farms | Waddell, AZ 85355 | $74,102 |
40 | Lamb Farms II 95 | Gilbert, AZ 85295 | $73,780 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”