Loan Deficiency in Maricopa County, Arizona, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 268
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Maricopa County, Arizona totaled $16,330,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | G Farms | El Mirage, AZ 85335 | $210,076 |
22 | Oatman Flats Ranch 95 Don't Use | Unknown, AZ 00000 | $197,356 |
23 | Reed Farms 92 | Tonopah, AZ 85354 | $180,842 |
24 | Rylan Farms | Tonopah, AZ 85354 | $173,209 |
25 | Donald A Wiechens Trust | Roll, AZ 85347 | $166,359 |
26 | Thomas J Perry Farms | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $160,759 |
27 | Discovery West Ranches Partners | Phoenix, AZ 85037 | $159,503 |
28 | Sandelbay Ranch Ptsp | Palo Verde, AZ 85343 | $158,418 |
29 | Brooks Farms | Goodyear, AZ 85395 | $148,566 |
30 | Knapple & Shelton | Laveen, AZ 85339 | $133,619 |
31 | Gingg Farms | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $131,189 |
32 | Two Sticks Farms | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $128,371 |
33 | Sheep Springs Sheep Co LLC | Chandler, AZ 85248 | $127,821 |
34 | Schulz Farms | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $122,912 |
35 | S & L Farms Ptn 93 | Palo Verde, AZ 85343 | $114,818 |
36 | Bailey Farms LLC | Tempe, AZ 85284 | $114,497 |
37 | Lanford Farms Partnership | Palo Verde, AZ 85343 | $111,989 |
38 | P R P Farms | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $111,577 |
39 | Laveen Farming Co | Phoenix, AZ 85082 | $103,384 |
40 | Moore Ranches Inc | Waddell, AZ 85355 | $101,403 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”