Market Loss Assistance Program in Maricopa County, Arizona, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 536
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Maricopa County, Arizona totaled $58,622,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | S D Farms | Phoenix, AZ 85021 | $543,632 |
22 | Jarnagin Farms Ptn 96 | Phoenix, AZ 85037 | $539,213 |
23 | Lone Butte Partnership | Laveen, AZ 85339 | $536,988 |
24 | Pettco Associates | Mesa, AZ 85203 | $524,140 |
25 | Discovery West Ranches Partners | Phoenix, AZ 85037 | $521,149 |
26 | Catron Cotton Co | Tonopah, AZ 85354 | $514,890 |
27 | Dobson Family Farms III C/o Marsh | Chandler, AZ 85248 | $477,004 |
28 | Carmichael Farms 96 | Palo Verde, AZ 85343 | $474,768 |
29 | G Farms | El Mirage, AZ 85335 | $462,324 |
30 | Hardison Farms II | Arlington, AZ 85322 | $435,855 |
31 | Sierra Negra Farms | Wickenburg, AZ 85358 | $416,597 |
32 | Hct Farms II | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $416,175 |
33 | Youngker & Youngker II 93 | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $402,625 |
34 | Paloma Partners II | Litchfield Park, AZ 85340 | $399,830 |
35 | O & E Farms | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $382,988 |
36 | D B Farms | Channahon, IL 60410 | $370,464 |
37 | B B F Farming 93 | Queen Creek, AZ 85142 | $362,126 |
38 | Brooks Farms | Goodyear, AZ 85395 | $360,000 |
39 | Accomazzo Company General Partnership | Tolleson, AZ 85353 | $359,715 |
40 | Falfa Farms 95 | Eloy, AZ 85131 | $356,563 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”