Market Loss Assistance Program in Maricopa County, Arizona, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 536
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Maricopa County, Arizona totaled $58,622,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Eagle Tail Farming Partnership | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $341,088 |
42 | Jpl Farms | Goodyear, AZ 85338 | $338,220 |
43 | Ken Sheely Ranches Partners | Phoenix, AZ 85037 | $337,326 |
44 | Knapple & Shelton II | Laveen, AZ 85339 | $332,020 |
45 | Act Farms II | Litchfield Park, AZ 85340 | $330,335 |
46 | Rhuts Ranch | Gila Bend, AZ 85337 | $327,685 |
47 | D Lamoreaux Farms II | Eloy, AZ 85131 | $322,853 |
48 | Agua Fria Farms II | Waddell, AZ 85355 | $315,240 |
49 | Paloma Partners | Gila Bend, AZ 85337 | $306,976 |
50 | J & J Fornes | Avondale, AZ 85323 | $306,850 |
51 | Carver Mountain Enterprises | Laveen, AZ 85339 | $302,748 |
52 | Arthur & Gerald Rovey Fm | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $300,136 |
53 | Sierra West Farms | Laveen, AZ 85339 | $293,076 |
54 | Ladra Farms II | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $291,816 |
55 | Hayden Farms Ptnshp | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $286,615 |
56 | Youngker Farms | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $282,516 |
57 | Lamb Farms II 95 | Gilbert, AZ 85295 | $279,776 |
58 | Michael Brooks Farms | Goodyear, AZ 85338 | $277,704 |
59 | Anderson Farms | Tolleson, AZ 85353 | $273,632 |
60 | 3 C Farming Co | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $268,976 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”