Farm Subsidy information
Maricopa County, Arizona
Total Subsidies in Maricopa County, Arizona, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,292
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Maricopa County, Arizona totaled $664,337,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Vaquero Company | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $2,468,704 |
62 | D Lamoreaux Farms II | Eloy, AZ 85131 | $2,384,738 |
63 | D B Farms | Channahon, IL 60410 | $2,319,003 |
64 | Hayden Farms Ptnshp | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $2,271,116 |
65 | Arlington Valley Farms | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $2,269,318 |
66 | Red Bullet Farms | Scottsdale, AZ 85260 | $2,236,457 |
67 | Gerben Boschma Dairy | Tolleson, AZ 85353 | $2,234,772 |
68 | Yellow Snail Farms | Scottsdale, AZ 85260 | $2,222,541 |
69 | Thomas J Perry Farms | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $2,179,457 |
70 | M & M Farms | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $2,138,171 |
71 | M & M Farms | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $2,099,939 |
72 | Greer Farms 91 | Tolleson, AZ 85353 | $2,094,780 |
73 | Zinke Dairy Inc | Sun Lakes, AZ 85248 | $2,089,490 |
74 | Tempe Farming Co | Maricopa, AZ 85139 | $2,082,713 |
75 | Barney Farms 92 | Queen Creek, AZ 85142 | $2,049,027 |
76 | Reed Farms 92 | Tonopah, AZ 85354 | $2,042,821 |
77 | Paloma Dairy Lp | Gila Bend, AZ 85337 | $2,027,126 |
78 | Belmont Mountain Dairy | Tonopah, AZ 85354 | $2,011,047 |
79 | Jarnagin Farms Ptn 96 | Phoenix, AZ 85037 | $1,980,436 |
80 | Schulz Farms | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $1,970,831 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”