Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Maricopa County, Arizona, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 173
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Maricopa County, Arizona totaled $35,785,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Sierra West Farms | Laveen, AZ 85339 | $557,108 |
22 | S D Farms | Phoenix, AZ 85021 | $555,436 |
23 | Red Bullet Farms | Scottsdale, AZ 85260 | $549,217 |
24 | Bales & Bales II | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $536,096 |
25 | Martori Family General Partnershi | Scottsdale, AZ 85260 | $528,349 |
26 | Tonopah Farms | Tonopah, AZ 85354 | $511,673 |
27 | Carmichael Farms 96 | Palo Verde, AZ 85343 | $398,067 |
28 | Rogers Brothers Farms Ptnshp | Laveen, AZ 85339 | $388,090 |
29 | G Farms | El Mirage, AZ 85335 | $382,546 |
30 | Santa Lucia Farms G P 97 | Phoenix, AZ 85037 | $368,939 |
31 | Grand View Dairy LLC | Phoenix, AZ 85016 | $328,622 |
32 | Dobson Farms V LLC | Florence, AZ 85132 | $322,233 |
33 | Cow Chow Croppers | Glendale, AZ 85303 | $315,062 |
34 | Schulz Farms, LLC | Tonopah, AZ 85354 | $310,534 |
35 | Stotz Farming | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $299,534 |
36 | Jjc Farms LLC | Tonopah, AZ 85354 | $288,736 |
37 | Ken Sheely Ranches Partners | Phoenix, AZ 85037 | $286,368 |
38 | Ladra Farms II | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $285,821 |
39 | Lamb Farms II 95 | Gilbert, AZ 85295 | $285,041 |
40 | River Ranch Joint Venture | Arlington, AZ 85322 | $274,276 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”