Farm Subsidy information
Mohave County, Arizona
Total Subsidies in Mohave County, Arizona, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 312
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Mohave County, Arizona totaled $62,424,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Tex Carter | Kingman, AZ 86401 | $37,112 |
102 | Martin Jackson | Peach Springs, AZ 86434 | $36,950 |
103 | Gevene E Savala | Fredonia, AZ 86022 | $36,448 |
104 | Leist Land And Livestock LLC. | Ash Fork, AZ 86320 | $35,803 |
105 | Coyote Springs District 5 | Peach Springs, AZ 86434 | $35,387 |
106 | Elroy A Bundy | Hugo, OK 74743 | $35,342 |
107 | Darwin L Honga | Valentine, AZ 86437 | $34,953 |
108 | Richard Hamilton | Kingman, AZ 86409 | $34,230 |
109 | Rose Mary Goldenstein | Peach Springs, AZ 86434 | $33,965 |
110 | Tommy J Dollarhide | Wikieup, AZ 85360 | $33,925 |
111 | Shelton S Crozier | Peach Springs, AZ 86434 | $33,833 |
112 | Gilbert Crook | Peach Springs, AZ 86434 | $33,573 |
113 | Ay Land & Cattle Co LLC | Prescott, AZ 86305 | $33,180 |
114 | Loren Bravo Sr | Peach Springs, AZ 86434 | $32,787 |
115 | Adam Jeremy Thomas | Las Vegas, NV 89148 | $32,453 |
116 | Orvel Bundy | Saint George, UT 84790 | $32,393 |
117 | Nelson Shirley | Springerville, AZ 85938 | $32,290 |
118 | Ronald Quasula Sr | Peach Springs, AZ 86434 | $32,206 |
119 | Kenny E Strickland | Coachella, CA 92236 | $31,708 |
120 | April Rush | Kingman, AZ 86409 | $30,871 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”