Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Navajo County, Arizona, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 144
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Navajo County, Arizona totaled $150,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Marlinda R Jim | Pinon, AZ 86510 | $491 |
82 | Mora H Yazzie | Indian Wells, AZ 86031 | $490 |
83 | Tommy Lewis Jr | Winslow, AZ 86047 | $440 |
84 | Tommy T Curtis Sr | Winslow, AZ 86047 | $440 |
85 | David K Lister | Indian Wells, AZ 86031 | $440 |
86 | Wilmer G Hijoe | Winslow, AZ 86047 | $440 |
87 | Lavaun Dyer | Second Mesa, AZ 86043 | $440 |
88 | Arthur Honani | Winslow, AZ 86047 | $440 |
89 | Jeffery Dennis | Kykotsmovi, AZ 86039 | $440 |
90 | Jimmy Hewey | Bloomfield, NM 87413 | $440 |
91 | Clayton Navakuku | Polacca, AZ 86042 | $440 |
92 | Bertha G Nelson | Kayenta, AZ 86033 | $439 |
93 | Harve Speck | Kayenta, AZ 86033 | $410 |
94 | Emerson Whitehorse | Kayenta, AZ 86033 | $409 |
95 | Ronald Price | Winslow, AZ 86047 | $385 |
96 | Spencer Pavinyama | Kykotsmovi, AZ 86039 | $385 |
97 | James Lee | Ganado, AZ 86505 | $385 |
98 | Leroy G Kewanimptewa Jr | Hotevilla, AZ 86030 | $385 |
99 | Terrance Outah | Kykotsmovi Village, AZ 86039 | $385 |
100 | Deanna K Nez | Indian Wells, AZ 86031 | $385 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”