Farm Subsidy information
Navajo County, Arizona
Total Subsidies in Navajo County, Arizona, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 3,174
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Navajo County, Arizona totaled $72,494,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Frank M Roubieu Jr | Taylor, AZ 85939 | $27,975 |
102 | Billy Austin Sr | Kayenta, AZ 86033 | $27,897 |
103 | Lorenzo R Begay | Indian Wells, AZ 86031 | $27,847 |
104 | Evelyn Patterson | Winslow, AZ 86047 | $27,655 |
105 | Jerry Thomas | Indian Wells, AZ 86031 | $27,596 |
106 | Chevelon Cyn Cattle Co | Winslow, AZ 86047 | $26,991 |
107 | Dollie Cly | Kayenta, AZ 86033 | $26,841 |
108 | Steve Flake Dba Bar A Cattle Comp | Snowflake, AZ 85937 | $26,315 |
109 | Lucinda D Notsch | Showlow, AZ 85901 | $26,147 |
110 | Joe Cattle Company LLC | Show Low, AZ 85902 | $26,066 |
111 | Ray Chapman Turley | Snowflake, AZ 85937 | $25,952 |
112 | Johnnie Morris Jr | Holbrook, AZ 86025 | $25,913 |
113 | Grasshopper Livestock Association | Cibecue, AZ 85911 | $25,793 |
114 | Julia A Shorty | Sanders, AZ 86512 | $25,561 |
115 | Ronald Gishey | Window Rock, AZ 86515 | $25,073 |
116 | Clarence L Osborne Dds | Snowflake, AZ 85937 | $24,563 |
117 | , | $24,334 | |
118 | Milton And Maurine Revocable Trus | Joseph City, AZ 86032 | $23,879 |
119 | Marie Benton | Winslow, AZ 86047 | $23,732 |
120 | Laroy Saline | Taylor, AZ 85939 | $23,682 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”