Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Pima County, Arizona, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 43
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Pima County, Arizona totaled $1,429,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Maria M Molina-whillock | Marana, AZ 85653 | $7,653 |
22 | James Leon | Ajo, AZ 85321 | $7,150 |
23 | Patrick Neal Whillock | Marana, AZ 85653 | $6,985 |
24 | Erik Heberle | Rillito, AZ 85654 | $6,215 |
25 | Michael Andrew Claves | Cochise, AZ 85606 | $6,082 |
26 | Oak Tree Land And Cattle Co LLC | Tucson, AZ 85705 | $5,775 |
27 | Robinson Cattle LLC | Green Valley, AZ 85622 | $5,555 |
28 | Armer-kobernik Ptns LLC | Vail, AZ 85641 | $5,170 |
29 | John Rueb | Amado, AZ 85645 | $4,909 |
30 | Jon R Weeks Dba Landscape Cacti | Tucson, AZ 85735 | $4,732 |
31 | Bar Running M/cross Six LLC | Marana, AZ 85653 | $4,455 |
32 | Vernon Ed Kile | Eloy, AZ 85131 | $4,125 |
33 | Juan M. Lopez | Green Valley, AZ 85614 | $4,125 |
34 | Bratton Farms & Harvest LLC | Chandler, AZ 85249 | $3,971 |
35 | Jesus G Arvizu | Tucson, AZ 85743 | $3,850 |
36 | D.t. Land & Cattle, LLC | Marana, AZ 85653 | $3,850 |
37 | Swsc Livestock LLC | Tucson, AZ 85710 | $2,805 |
38 | Thomas E Penrod | Joseph City, AZ 86032 | $2,420 |
39 | 1up Enterprises Dba Desert Pearl | Tucson, AZ 85718 | $1,937 |
40 | Jason Lamont Andersen | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $1,870 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”