Farm Subsidy information
Pima County, Arizona
Total Subsidies in Pima County, Arizona, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 219
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Pima County, Arizona totaled $96,774,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Oak Tree Land And Cattle Co LLC | Tucson, AZ 85705 | $71,983 |
82 | State Of Arizona | Phoenix, AZ 85009 | $68,648 |
83 | Emilio C Figueroa Jr | Marana, AZ 85653 | $67,813 |
84 | Tze Shar Chu | Tucson, AZ 85745 | $66,705 |
85 | Estate Of Buck Sam Chu | Tucson, AZ 85745 | $66,705 |
86 | Bruce Buchanan | Arivaca, AZ 85601 | $63,519 |
87 | Bridle Bit Ranch LLC | Marana, AZ 85653 | $63,293 |
88 | John Walker | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $62,841 |
89 | Joe M King Land & Cattle Co | Tucson, AZ 85736 | $59,118 |
90 | Chutum Vaya Grazing Association | Topawa, AZ 85639 | $58,913 |
91 | Bilron Farms A Ptns. | Marana, AZ 85653 | $57,503 |
92 | Edmund Salazar Ogle | Eloy, AZ 85131 | $55,799 |
93 | M And J Farm Trust | Tucson, AZ 85704 | $53,229 |
94 | Frederic James Miracle | Tucson, AZ 85746 | $53,061 |
95 | James E Glover Jr | Marana, AZ 85653 | $52,284 |
96 | Michael Joseph Giardinelli | Cortaro, AZ 85652 | $51,878 |
97 | Herbert Kai Farms | Rillito, AZ 85654 | $50,503 |
98 | Walker Farms Ptshp | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $47,231 |
99 | Marana Stockyards And Livestock M | Marana, AZ 85653 | $46,177 |
100 | Ja Bell Dba Sierrita Mining & Ranching Co | Sahuarita, AZ 85629 | $45,970 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”