Total Commodity Programs in Pima County, Arizona, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 148
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Pima County, Arizona totaled $43,925,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Michael Giardinelli | Tucson, AZ 85745 | $3,627 |
122 | Herbert Kai | Rillito, AZ 85654 | $3,619 |
123 | Anita E Halbach | Marana, AZ 85653 | $3,374 |
124 | Jon K Post | Marana, AZ 85653 | $2,931 |
125 | Faron Bingham Enterprises LLC | San Manuel, AZ 85631 | $2,868 |
126 | Thomas E Penrod | Joseph City, AZ 86032 | $2,420 |
127 | Emily Jeanne Parsons Wengert | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $2,177 |
128 | 1up Enterprises Dba Desert Pearl | Tucson, AZ 85718 | $1,937 |
129 | Brent R Pinard | Sahuarita, AZ 85629 | $1,826 |
130 | John Leo Black Dba 3b Cattle Company | Sahuarita, AZ 85629 | $1,485 |
131 | Ethel M. Jones | Fallon, NV 89406 | $1,267 |
132 | Edward W Lusby | Tucson, AZ 85713 | $1,225 |
133 | Despain Cattle Co | Marana, AZ 85653 | $892 |
134 | Gerald Hosterman | Tucson, AZ 85730 | $801 |
135 | Daniel Lee Crook | Marana, AZ 85653 | $716 |
136 | D T Land & Cattle LLC | Marana, AZ 85653 | $578 |
137 | Tor Sorensen | Tucson, AZ 85737 | $428 |
138 | Mary Jane Gamez | Tucson, AZ 85749 | $235 |
139 | Christopher Reid Sullivan | Marana, AZ 85658 | $89 |
140 | Stacy Pratt Sullivan | Marana, AZ 85658 | $89 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”