Farm Subsidy information
Pima County, Arizona
Total Subsidies in Pima County, Arizona, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 211
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Pima County, Arizona totaled $80,337,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41 | Arivaca Ranch LLC | Pritchett, CO 81064 | $229,610 |
| 42 | William J Schnaufer Jr | Green Valley, AZ 85622 | $227,666 |
| 43 | J And J Ptns | Tucson, AZ 85743 | $208,687 |
| 44 | 5kg Investment Company LLC | Tucson, AZ 85704 | $208,627 |
| 45 | Ls Cattle Company LLC | Phoenix, AZ 85012 | $203,434 |
| 46 | Patrick Neal Whillock | Marana, AZ 85653 | $191,805 |
| 47 | C-spear LLC | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $187,397 |
| 48 | Barnett Family Trust | Marana, AZ 85653 | $186,449 |
| 49 | Redington Livestock | Benson, AZ 85602 | $182,297 |
| 50 | Sg Farms LLC | Marana, AZ 85658 | $180,626 |
| 51 | Gaye Walker | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $171,038 |
| 52 | Dakota Shayne Harris | Dragoon, AZ 85609 | $166,257 |
| 53 | Navarro Ranch LLC | Green Valley, AZ 85622 | $163,818 |
| 54 | Armer-kobernik Ptns LLC | Vail, AZ 85641 | $148,993 |
| 55 | University Of Arizona | Maricopa, AZ 85138 | $148,033 |
| 56 | Michael Andrew Claves | Cochise, AZ 85606 | $145,656 |
| 57 | Gerald Hosterman | Tucson, AZ 85730 | $140,245 |
| 58 | Robinson Cattle LLC | Green Valley, AZ 85622 | $128,920 |
| 59 | Onofre De La Ossa | Patagonia, AZ 85624 | $126,813 |
| 60 | Vernon Ed Kile | Eloy, AZ 85131 | $126,186 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf