Farm Subsidy information
Pima County, Arizona
Total Subsidies in Pima County, Arizona, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 219
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Pima County, Arizona totaled $96,774,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Burruel & Burruel Farms Ptshp | Marana, AZ 85653 | $6,354,825 |
2 | Post Farms | Marana, AZ 85653 | $5,925,725 |
3 | Pacheco Farm Management & Consulting Co | Marana, AZ 85653 | $3,984,614 |
4 | Ernest Bratton Etal Ptr Dba La Fa | Marana, AZ 85653 | $2,711,405 |
5 | Tnt Farms | Marana, AZ 85653 | $2,359,449 |
6 | Clark Farms Jv | Tucson, AZ 85743 | $2,047,510 |
7 | Vera Earl Ranch Inc | Sonoita, AZ 85637 | $1,883,694 |
8 | Sds Farms Ptns | Marana, AZ 85653 | $1,623,783 |
9 | Kai Farms | Cortaro, AZ 85652 | $1,569,400 |
10 | Double B Farms A Ptns | Marana, AZ 85653 | $1,539,328 |
11 | Double D Farms Ptshp | Marana, AZ 85653 | $1,353,632 |
12 | James K Chilton Jr | Arivaca, AZ 85601 | $1,009,585 |
13 | Murphy Farms J V | Tucson, AZ 85743 | $834,132 |
14 | Zamora Farms | Tucson, AZ 85743 | $828,518 |
15 | San Xavier Coop Assoc Inc | Tucson, AZ 85746 | $752,896 |
16 | John F King & Son Inc | Tucson, AZ 85736 | $727,572 |
17 | Las Pilas Ranches A Ptns | Phoenix, AZ 85021 | $681,274 |
18 | Sonia Bratton | Marana, AZ 85653 | $602,806 |
19 | Fred Barnett Farms | Marana, AZ 85653 | $542,838 |
20 | Tohono O'odham Farming Authority | Eloy, AZ 85131 | $540,625 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>