Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Pinal County, Arizona, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 65
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Pinal County, Arizona totaled $5,890,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Charles Bush | Eloy, AZ 85131 | $74,888 |
22 | Armando Lawrence Rodriguez | Winkelman, AZ 85192 | $72,893 |
23 | Gary T Mix Sr | Bapchule, AZ 85121 | $62,769 |
24 | Steamboat Cresent Ranch-kearny LLC | Tucson, AZ 85741 | $59,408 |
25 | Vince Ferreira | Queen Valley, AZ 85118 | $50,645 |
26 | Rail 3 Az, LLC | Florence, AZ 85132 | $48,035 |
27 | Wyatt James Ferreira | Queen Valley, AZ 85118 | $47,366 |
28 | Mann Ranch LLC | Mammoth, AZ 85618 | $40,727 |
29 | Peoples Properties LLC | Scottsdale, AZ 85260 | $37,439 |
30 | Rafter D Cattle Company, Inc. | Scottsdale, AZ 85266 | $35,952 |
31 | Slash D LLC | Joseph City, AZ 86032 | $34,136 |
32 | Shepley Ranch LLC | Tucson, AZ 85755 | $34,099 |
33 | Craig Shelley | Chandler Heights, AZ 85127 | $33,995 |
34 | Don Seifert | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $31,480 |
35 | Rancho Asueno Inc | Eloy, AZ 85131 | $31,257 |
36 | Deanna Johns | Sacaton, AZ 85147 | $29,731 |
37 | Manterola Sheep Co Inc | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $28,817 |
38 | Dnh Cattle Co LLC | Mesa, AZ 85207 | $23,198 |
39 | Dnh Cattle Co LLC | Kearny, AZ 85137 | $22,034 |
40 | Jim Bingham | San Manuel, AZ 85631 | $21,461 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”