Non-insured Disaster Assistance in Pinal County, Arizona, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 59
Recipients of Non-insured Disaster Assistance from farms in Pinal County, Arizona totaled $857,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Non-insured Disaster Assistance 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Dos Vaqueros Volando LLC | Phoenix, AZ 85051 | $10,999 |
22 | Mosty Farms Inc | Chandler, AZ 85249 | $10,839 |
23 | Augustin Woody Madrid Jr | Arizona City, AZ 85223 | $10,293 |
24 | Richard V Claridge | Safford, AZ 85546 | $9,482 |
25 | Parks Cattle Co | Casa Grande, AZ 85222 | $8,988 |
26 | Picacho Peak Land & Cattle LLC | Parshall, CO 80468 | $8,852 |
27 | Stan Jolley | Rock Springs, WY 82902 | $8,445 |
28 | Vance Claridge | Safford, AZ 85546 | $8,260 |
29 | Ruiz Ranch Inc | Superior, AZ 85173 | $8,115 |
30 | Jim Pate Farms Ptshp | Casa Grande, AZ 85230 | $7,606 |
31 | Government Springs Ranch | Tucson, AZ 85755 | $7,291 |
32 | J-p Cattle Company LLC | Snowflake, AZ 85937 | $6,372 |
33 | Joseph Auza Sheep Co | Casa Grande, AZ 85122 | $5,858 |
34 | Michael James Mercer | Mammoth, AZ 85618 | $5,750 |
35 | Manterola Sheep Co Inc | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $5,140 |
36 | T U Ranch | Superior, AZ 85273 | $5,043 |
37 | Dee Johnson / J Bar P Cattle Co | Snowflake, AZ 85937 | $4,936 |
38 | Auza & Son Farms Ptshp | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $4,588 |
39 | Virgil A Mercer | Mammoth, AZ 85618 | $4,176 |
40 | Charles Bush | Eloy, AZ 85131 | $4,036 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”