Deficiency Payment in Pinal County, Arizona, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 421
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Pinal County, Arizona totaled $-1,747,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Odus Hughes | Casa Grande, AZ 85222 | $8,237 |
22 | Sbcp Family Ltd Ptshp | Tucson, AZ 85750 | $7,888 |
23 | Double R Farms Inc | Maricopa, AZ 85239 | $7,820 |
24 | Bolynn Farms Inc | Maricopa, AZ 85239 | $7,272 |
25 | Ben & Betsy Zink Dba Ben Zink | Casa Grande, AZ 85230 | $7,028 |
26 | Vekol Ranches | Litchfield Park, AZ 85340 | $6,863 |
27 | Hamilton Farming Co | Chandler, AZ 85225 | $6,772 |
28 | D & M Farms | Monmouth, OR 97361 | $6,420 |
29 | Charles Bush | Eloy, AZ 85131 | $6,269 |
30 | Sds Farms Ptns | Marana, AZ 85653 | $6,245 |
31 | Burruel & Burruel Farms Ptshp | Marana, AZ 85653 | $5,988 |
32 | Midway LLC | Casa Grande, AZ 85222 | $5,914 |
33 | -r.p.t. J.v.- | Coolidge, AZ 85228 | $5,278 |
34 | R A S Farms | Casa Grande, AZ 85230 | $4,980 |
35 | Terry Bros Farms | Willcox, AZ 85643 | $4,848 |
36 | David Karl Kochsmeier | Bethlehem, PA 18015 | $4,647 |
37 | Rancho Asueno Inc | Eloy, AZ 85131 | $4,470 |
38 | Charles Schilling | Phoenix, AZ 85001 | $4,310 |
39 | Triple H Farms Inc | Arizona City, AZ 85223 | $3,632 |
40 | Anderson Palmisano Farms | Maricopa, AZ 85138 | $3,179 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”