Total Commodity Programs in Pinal County, Arizona, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 142
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Pinal County, Arizona totaled $3,177,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Brown Farming Company | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $23,188 |
22 | , | $22,968 | |
23 | Rio Farming General Partnership | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $21,733 |
24 | Button Farms | Sacaton, AZ 85147 | $20,149 |
25 | Brynn-con Farms | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $18,796 |
26 | River Bush Farms | Eloy, AZ 85131 | $17,788 |
27 | Santa Cruz Ranch | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $17,659 |
28 | Margaret C Goree-shaw | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $17,535 |
29 | Mourning Dove Mountain Farms LLC | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $17,448 |
30 | Double D Dairy Ltd | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $17,445 |
31 | Terra Firma | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $16,833 |
32 | Cooley Farms LLC | Mesa, AZ 85212 | $15,819 |
33 | Silver Bullet Farms | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $14,087 |
34 | Christopher Dent Warren | Scottsdale, AZ 85262 | $13,932 |
35 | Chase Warren Dba Chase Warren Farms | Scottsdale, AZ 85250 | $13,732 |
36 | Robert Boyle Farms LLC | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $13,140 |
37 | John & Lorna Nevitt Farms | San Tan Valley, AZ 85143 | $12,783 |
38 | Christopher Jonathan Carranza | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $12,565 |
39 | Rancho Pobre Farms | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $11,895 |
40 | Jamie Shaw | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $11,875 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”