Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Pinal County, Arizona, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 75
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Pinal County, Arizona totaled $1,280,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Diamond B Livestock LLC | Florence, AZ 85132 | $3,773 |
42 | Ronald Redell Deen | Kearny, AZ 85137 | $3,021 |
43 | Charles Bush | Eloy, AZ 85131 | $2,996 |
44 | Rancho Asueno Inc | Eloy, AZ 85131 | $2,970 |
45 | Joel Wengert | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $2,834 |
46 | Slash D LLC | Joseph City, AZ 86032 | $2,747 |
47 | Cross Cane Land And Cattle, LLC | San Tan Valley, AZ 85140 | $2,594 |
48 | George Aros | Picacho, AZ 85141 | $2,180 |
49 | Vernon St John | Maricopa, AZ 85139 | $1,784 |
50 | Manterola Sheep Co Inc | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $1,736 |
51 | Sierra Farming Partnership III | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $1,640 |
52 | Geoff Decker | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $1,637 |
53 | M Eldon Taylor Land And Cattle Co | Gilbert, AZ 85298 | $1,611 |
54 | Ralph Montano Dba M7 Brangus & Barbados Ranch LLC | Mammoth, AZ 85618 | $1,458 |
55 | Harriett F Hedrick | Tucson, AZ 85719 | $1,179 |
56 | Deanna Johns | Sacaton, AZ 85147 | $1,160 |
57 | William George Martin | Superior, AZ 85173 | $1,147 |
58 | Lynn A Martin | Superior, AZ 85173 | $1,112 |
59 | Allen Ellis | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $1,080 |
60 | Tabletop Vista Ranch LLC | Chandler, AZ 85249 | $952 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”