Farm Subsidy information
Pinal County, Arizona
Total Subsidies in Pinal County, Arizona, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 194
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Pinal County, Arizona totaled $28,118,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Henness & Henness | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $88,674 |
42 | Mrs Elaine H Nowlin | Casa Grande, AZ 85122 | $87,699 |
43 | Button Farms | Sacaton, AZ 85147 | $85,645 |
44 | Wade Christian Lueck | Gilbert, AZ 85234 | $85,169 |
45 | John Voigts Dba Sunbelt Farms | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $82,758 |
46 | , | $81,075 | |
47 | Ramona Enterprises LLC | Sacaton, AZ 85147 | $77,057 |
48 | Mickey A Clark | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $76,226 |
49 | Riata Farms | Queen Creek, AZ 85142 | $74,641 |
50 | Bar C Bar Feed Company LLC | San Tan Valley, AZ 85140 | $73,082 |
51 | Riggins Farms II | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $72,010 |
52 | Dart Organics LLC | Sacaton, AZ 85147 | $70,284 |
53 | Koepnick Family Farms | San Tan Valley, AZ 85143 | $68,472 |
54 | Silver Bullet Farms | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $68,329 |
55 | Macario Perez | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $66,206 |
56 | G & H Land & Cattle Co | Oracle, AZ 85623 | $65,564 |
57 | Desert Cross Holdings LLC | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $65,169 |
58 | Cooley Farms LLC | Mesa, AZ 85212 | $64,630 |
59 | Auza & Son Farms III | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $60,561 |
60 | Sasco Cattle Co LLC | Red Rock, AZ 85145 | $59,165 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”