Counter Cyclical Program in Pinal County, Arizona, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 692
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Pinal County, Arizona totaled $128,825,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Catalina Farms | Eloy, AZ 85131 | $664,900 |
42 | T M Farms | Eloy, AZ 85231 | $663,726 |
43 | Le Smith Farms Ptshp | Mesa, AZ 85207 | $656,412 |
44 | Morning Star Farms | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $652,460 |
45 | Hbe Farms | Maricopa, AZ 85138 | $625,812 |
46 | Barcello Farms | Gilbert, AZ 85299 | $620,373 |
47 | A & B Farms | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $611,216 |
48 | Fast Track Farms | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $592,949 |
49 | Davis Farms | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $588,982 |
50 | Gable & Hardison Farming | San Tan Valley, AZ 85143 | $582,308 |
51 | Salcot Planting Co | Casa Grande, AZ 85222 | $580,688 |
52 | Precision Farming | San Tan Valley, AZ 85143 | $579,152 |
53 | River Bush Farms | Eloy, AZ 85131 | $564,276 |
54 | Pew-ellsworth Farms | Queen Creek, AZ 85242 | $563,445 |
55 | Terry Bros Farms | Willcox, AZ 85643 | $560,624 |
56 | Jonathan W Householder Itty Bitty | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $559,656 |
57 | Raintree Farms | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $551,228 |
58 | El Fuerte Farms | Longview, WA 98632 | $550,328 |
59 | Gladden Family Farms | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $549,250 |
60 | Peterson Farms 95 | Gilbert, AZ 85234 | $546,031 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”