Cotton Ginning Program in Pinal County, Arizona, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 137
Recipients of Cotton Ginning Program from farms in Pinal County, Arizona totaled $6,338,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Ginning Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Santa Cruz Ranch | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $26,586 |
62 | Table Mountain Farms | Winkelman, AZ 85192 | $26,462 |
63 | Cruye & Ellis Blackwater Farms | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $26,349 |
64 | Salcot Planting Co | Casa Grande, AZ 85222 | $24,833 |
65 | Rg Farms LLC | Casa Grande, AZ 85122 | $24,538 |
66 | Jessica Weddle | Casa Grande, AZ 85122 | $24,292 |
67 | Cory Weddle | Casa Grande, AZ 85122 | $24,292 |
68 | Henness & Henness | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $23,572 |
69 | Evans & Evans/mike & Julie Evans | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $23,492 |
70 | Normark Farms LLC | Arizona City, AZ 85123 | $22,969 |
71 | Mourning Dove Mountain Farms LLC | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $22,569 |
72 | Arp Family Farms | Chandler, AZ 85248 | $21,928 |
73 | Gillespie Farms | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $21,510 |
74 | Frank Shedd & Son Ptshp | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $20,784 |
75 | Stanley Ellis | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $19,736 |
76 | Tres Hermanas Farms LLC | Casa Grande, AZ 85294 | $18,498 |
77 | Terra Firma | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $16,125 |
78 | Jamie Shaw | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $15,510 |
79 | Margaret C Goree-shaw | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $15,510 |
80 | Tempe Farming Co | Maricopa, AZ 85139 | $15,378 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”