Farm Subsidy information
Pinal County, Arizona
Total Subsidies in Pinal County, Arizona, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 209
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Pinal County, Arizona totaled $26,352,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Ramona's American Indian Foods, LLC | Sacaton, AZ 85147 | $30,045 |
62 | Dakota Farms LLC | Maricopa, AZ 85139 | $29,626 |
63 | Sierra Farming Partnership II | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $28,885 |
64 | Tempe Farming Co | Maricopa, AZ 85139 | $28,414 |
65 | Joseph A Auza Sheep Co LLC | Casa Grande, AZ 85122 | $27,265 |
66 | Steamboat Cresent Ranch-kearny LLC | Tucson, AZ 85741 | $26,816 |
67 | , | $26,089 | |
68 | Karrie Ellis | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $25,736 |
69 | Allen Ellis | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $25,735 |
70 | Auza Ranches LLC | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $24,889 |
71 | , | $24,617 | |
72 | Cross Creek Dairy | Dinuba, CA 93618 | $23,750 |
73 | Cy William Salmons | Casa Grande, AZ 85122 | $22,756 |
74 | Christopher Jonathan Carranza | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $22,393 |
75 | Mourning Dove Mountain Farms LLC | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $22,166 |
76 | Antonio M Haro Bianem Farms | Casa Grande, AZ 85122 | $21,216 |
77 | Kelly Freeman Farms Inc | Gilbert, AZ 85298 | $19,869 |
78 | Gary T Mix Sr | Bapchule, AZ 85121 | $18,391 |
79 | River Bush Farms | Eloy, AZ 85131 | $17,788 |
80 | Double D Dairy Ltd | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $17,445 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”