Total Emergency Relief Program in Pinal County, Arizona, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 82
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Pinal County, Arizona totaled $6,743,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Tierra Verde Farms Ptshp | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $7,541 |
62 | Brittney Irene Carranza | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $7,230 |
63 | Ruby Farms | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $6,978 |
64 | Trevor Daniel Nowlin | Casa Grande, AZ 85122 | $6,668 |
65 | Barnes & Sons II | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $6,637 |
66 | Raintree Farms II | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $6,197 |
67 | Mike Evans | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $5,774 |
68 | Joseph A Auza Jr | Casa Grande, AZ 85122 | $5,286 |
69 | Keeling Family Ptshp II | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $5,039 |
70 | Sunbelt Farms Transportation LLC | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $4,965 |
71 | Allen E Clark | Florence, AZ 85132 | $4,894 |
72 | Mourning Dove Mountain Farms LLC | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $4,718 |
73 | Triple M Farms 95 | Gilbert, AZ 85234 | $4,473 |
74 | Lynch Ranch Ptshp | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $3,937 |
75 | Rancho Cassiopeia LLC | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $1,928 |
76 | John Nathaniel Keeling | Phoenix, AZ 85044 | $1,378 |
77 | Joshua Montgomery Keeling | Casa Grande, AZ 85122 | $1,331 |
78 | Paul William Keeling | Casa Grande, AZ 85122 | $867 |
79 | , | $627 | |
80 | Camille Nish | Sacaton, AZ 85147 | $353 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”