Market Loss Assistance Program in Pinal County, Arizona, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 627
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Pinal County, Arizona totaled $43,804,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Precision Farming | San Tan Valley, AZ 85143 | $175,820 |
62 | Henness & Henness | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $173,779 |
63 | Fast Track Farms | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $170,682 |
64 | Walter E Holland Jt Ven | Casa Grande, AZ 85294 | $170,588 |
65 | M Patrick Talla Farms | Stanfield, AZ 85272 | $168,458 |
66 | Frank Shedd & Son Ptshp | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $168,388 |
67 | Ruby Farms | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $165,647 |
68 | Jack & Doris Henness Farms | Casa Grande, AZ 85122 | $165,250 |
69 | Hamilton Farms | Arizona City, AZ 85223 | $159,425 |
70 | Ben & Betsy Zink Dba Ben Zink | Casa Grande, AZ 85230 | $159,318 |
71 | Bar U-7 Ptshp | Casa Grande, AZ 85222 | $157,611 |
72 | Tabletop Tillage | Maricopa, AZ 85239 | $156,288 |
73 | Anderson Palmisano Farms | Maricopa, AZ 85138 | $156,208 |
74 | Pratt Farms Ptshp | Maricopa, AZ 85139 | $154,995 |
75 | C & J Farms | Eloy, AZ 85231 | $153,408 |
76 | Dickson Farming Co | Yuma, AZ 85365 | $152,965 |
77 | L-t-j Farming Co | Mesa, AZ 85215 | $150,768 |
78 | De Farms | Stanfield, AZ 85272 | $149,550 |
79 | Salcot Planting Co | Casa Grande, AZ 85222 | $148,201 |
80 | Daniel Nowlin Farms Ptshp | Casa Grande, AZ 85222 | $145,311 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”