Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Pinal County, Arizona, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 152

Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Pinal County, Arizona totaled $3,604,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Environmental Quality Incentives Program
1995-2023
61Vernon SunnaSacaton, AZ 85247$17,763
62Ernestine RathborneBoston, MA 02108$17,431
63Philip DenormandieBoston, MA 02108$17,429
64Francis LabriolaPhoenix, AZ 85044$17,297
65Preston & Terri PorterCoolidge, AZ 85128$17,204
66Ted KulpChalfont, PA 18914$17,178
67P W Feenstra Construction IncQueen Creek, AZ 85242$16,961
68Sammie L CaywoodCasa Grande, AZ 85222$16,952
69Thomas N CaywoodCasa Grande, AZ 85222$16,951
70W A 'sonny' DunnMaricopa, AZ 85138$16,682
71George FelizFlorence, AZ 85232$16,668
72Claude BrownCasa Grande, AZ 85194$16,418
73Kachina Land Co LLCParadise Valley, AZ 85253$16,240
74Catherine J GormanWinkelman, AZ 85292$16,036
75Yancey Farms LLCEloy, AZ 85231$16,032
76John Thude Farms Ptshp 2Stanfield, AZ 85272$15,827
77John DonleyCasa Grande, AZ 85193$15,188
78John H Dermer & Son IICasa Grande, AZ 85222$15,142
79William W Warren B & J FarmArizona City, AZ 85123$14,868
80Paul B SmithWinkelman, AZ 85292$14,790

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag