Total Disaster Programs in Pinal County, Arizona, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 167
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Pinal County, Arizona totaled $11,233,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Dale Button Farms LLC | Sacaton, AZ 85147 | $33,051 |
82 | Steamboat Cresent Ranch-kearny LLC | Tucson, AZ 85741 | $32,427 |
83 | Berry Farms LLC | Marana, AZ 85653 | $28,858 |
84 | Gaye Walker | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $28,665 |
85 | Wuertz Farm | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $27,906 |
86 | Dakota Farms LLC | Maricopa, AZ 85139 | $27,172 |
87 | Ramona's American Indian Foods, LLC | Sacaton, AZ 85147 | $26,788 |
88 | Cna LLC | Casa Grande, AZ 85122 | $26,759 |
89 | Rail 3 Az, LLC | Florence, AZ 85132 | $26,741 |
90 | John Walker | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $24,926 |
91 | Ralph S III And Carol E Dubois Living Trust | Kearny, AZ 85137 | $24,262 |
92 | Julie Evans | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $22,851 |
93 | Hboyz LLC | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $21,509 |
94 | England Farming Ptshp | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $21,319 |
95 | Shanley Turner Ranches LLC | San Tan Valley, AZ 85140 | $20,611 |
96 | Neil Clayton Golson | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $20,600 |
97 | Mike Evans | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $19,870 |
98 | Antonio M Haro Bianem Farms | Casa Grande, AZ 85122 | $19,000 |
99 | Dnh Cattle Co LLC | Mesa, AZ 85207 | $18,450 |
100 | Lorna Nevitt | Queen Creek, AZ 85143 | $18,334 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”