Total Emergency Relief Program in Pinal County, Arizona, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 124
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Pinal County, Arizona totaled $9,877,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Mike Evans | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $19,870 |
82 | Antonio M Haro Bianem Farms | Casa Grande, AZ 85122 | $19,000 |
83 | Lorna Nevitt | Queen Creek, AZ 85143 | $18,334 |
84 | Trey Kelly Nowlin | Casa Grande, AZ 85122 | $16,843 |
85 | , | $16,515 | |
86 | Gen III Farms LLC | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $16,244 |
87 | Shappell Farms LLC | Gilbert, AZ 85297 | $16,039 |
88 | John O Nevitt | San Tan Valley, AZ 85143 | $15,942 |
89 | Dairy View Farms LLC | Queen Creek, AZ 85142 | $15,017 |
90 | Precision Farming | San Tan Valley, AZ 85143 | $14,417 |
91 | William -wells Family Trst March 11 2005 | Costa Mesa, CA 92626 | $14,361 |
92 | Charles William Salmons | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $14,220 |
93 | Christine Ann Salmons | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $14,220 |
94 | Sunbelt Farms Transportation LLC | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $13,724 |
95 | Bar And Farms LLC | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $13,330 |
96 | Dart Z Farms LLC | Casa Grande, AZ 85122 | $13,200 |
97 | Gable & Hardison Farming | San Tan Valley, AZ 85143 | $12,278 |
98 | Tammy Auza | Casa Grande, AZ 85122 | $11,565 |
99 | Tempe Farming Co | Maricopa, AZ 85139 | $10,246 |
100 | Joseph A Auza Jr | Casa Grande, AZ 85122 | $10,057 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”